Rio
83ccf8081b
Co-authored-by: Rio <rio@agents.livingip.xyz> Co-committed-by: Rio <rio@agents.livingip.xyz>
63 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
title: "@01Resolved X archive — 100 most recent tweets"
|
|
author: "01Resolved (@01Resolved)"
|
|
url: https://x.com/01Resolved
|
|
date: 2026-03-09
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: tweet
|
|
status: processed
|
|
processed_by: rio
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-09
|
|
enrichments:
|
|
- "MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions"
|
|
- "futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent"
|
|
tags: [metadao, governance-analytics, ranger-liquidation, solomon, decision-markets, turbine]
|
|
linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
|
|
curator_notes: |
|
|
Analyst account providing the deepest on-chain forensics of MetaDAO governance events.
|
|
This is the data layer — while Proph3t provides ideology and Felipe provides thesis,
|
|
01Resolved provides the numbers. Key contribution: Ranger liquidation forensics with
|
|
exact trader counts, volume, alignment percentages. Also tracking Solomon treasury
|
|
governance and Turbine buyback mechanics. Low follower count (~500) but extremely high
|
|
signal density — this is the account writing the kind of analysis we should be writing.
|
|
extraction_hints:
|
|
- "Ranger liquidation forensics: 92.41% pass-aligned, 33 traders, $119K volume — data for enriching futarchy governance claims"
|
|
- "Solomon treasury subcommittee analysis — evidence for 'futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding'"
|
|
- "Turbine buyback TWAP threshold filtering — mechanism design detail, potential new claim about automated treasury management"
|
|
- "Decision market participation data — contributes to 'MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions'"
|
|
- "Cross-reference: do contested decisions show higher volume than uncontested? The Ranger liquidation data vs routine proposals could test this"
|
|
priority: high
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# @01Resolved X Archive (March 2026)
|
|
|
|
## Substantive Tweets
|
|
|
|
### Ranger Liquidation Forensics
|
|
- 92.41% of decision market value aligned with pass (liquidation)
|
|
- 33 unique traders participated in the governance decision
|
|
- $119K total trading volume in the decision market
|
|
- Timeline analysis of how the market reached consensus
|
|
- This is the most complete public dataset on a futarchy enforcement event
|
|
|
|
### Solomon Treasury Subcommittee
|
|
- Detailed analysis of DP-00001 (treasury subcommittee formation)
|
|
- Tracking how Solomon is building traditional governance structures within futarchy framework
|
|
- Coverage of committee composition, authority scope, reporting requirements
|
|
- Signal: even futarchy-native projects need human-scale operational governance
|
|
|
|
### Turbine Buyback Analysis
|
|
- TWAP (time-weighted average price) threshold filtering for automated buybacks
|
|
- Mechanism detail: buybacks trigger only when token price crosses specific thresholds
|
|
- This is automated treasury management through price signals — a concrete mechanism design innovation
|
|
- Connects to existing claim about ownership coin treasuries being actively managed
|
|
|
|
### Decision Market Data
|
|
- Tracks participation and volume across multiple MetaDAO governance decisions
|
|
- Pattern: contested decisions (Ranger liquidation) show significantly higher volume than routine proposals
|
|
- This data directly tests whether futarchy's "limited trading volume in uncontested decisions" is a feature (efficient agreement) or a bug (low participation)
|
|
|
|
## Noise Filtered Out
|
|
- ~80 tweets were engagement, community interaction, event promotion
|
|
- Very high substantive ratio for the original content that does exist
|