teleo-codex/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-create-futardio.md
m3taversal 1fef01b163 fix: prefix 543 broken wiki-links with maps/ directory
13 map file targets were linked as bare names ([[livingip overview]])
but files live at maps/. Script walks all claim files outside maps/
and prefixes with maps/ path. 351 files modified, zero remaining
bare instances, zero double-prefixes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-21 14:54:41 +01:00

2.9 KiB

type entity_type name domain status tracked_by created last_updated parent_entity platform proposer proposal_url proposal_date resolution_date category summary tags source_archive related reweave_edges
decision decision_market MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio? internet-finance failed rio 2026-03-11 2026-03-11 metadao futardio unknown https://v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/zN9Uft1zEsh9h7Wspeg5bTNirBBvtBTaJ6i5KcEnbAb 2024-11-21 2024-11-25 strategy Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification
futarchy
futardio
governance-filtering
inbox/archive/2024-11-21-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-create-futardio.md
{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}
futardio-proposal-1
test-dao-testing-indexer-changes
{'Futardio': 'Proposal'}
Futardio: Proposal #1|related|2026-04-19
Test DAO: Testing indexer changes|related|2026-04-19

MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?

Summary

A minimal one-sentence proposal: "Futardio is a great idea and needs to happen." Filed under the "Program" category. Failed within 4 days. No budget, no specification, no implementation plan. The proposer identity is not associated with core team members.

Market Data

  • Outcome: Failed (2024-11-25)
  • Autocrat version: 0.3
  • Key participants: Unknown proposer

Significance

This failed proposal is more informative than many that passed. It demonstrates futarchy's quality filtering function — the market rejected an unsubstantiated proposal despite the concept (Futardio/permissionless launchpad) eventually being approved three months later with proper specification (see metadao-release-launchpad). The market distinguished between "good idea" and "well-specified proposal," rejecting the former and approving the latter.

This is concrete evidence against the criticism that futarchy markets are easily manipulated or that token holders vote based on vibes rather than substance. The failure also shows that non-founder community members can propose, even if their proposals face higher scrutiny.

Note: The later "Release a Launchpad" proposal (2025-02-26) by Proph3t and Kollan succeeded — same concept, dramatically better specification.

Relationship to KB


Relevant Entities:

  • metadao — parent organization
  • futardio — the entity that was eventually created

Topics:

Full Proposal Text

Source: futard.io, tabled 2024-11-21

Futardio is a great idea and needs to happen