b917ff7e4f
- What: Added Yamamoto (PLOS One, 2026-02) as evidence to the existing Arrow's impossibility claim in foundations/collective-intelligence/. Enriched body with paragraph on formal proof calculus representation and its implications. Updated source field and last_evaluated date. Marked archive source as processed. - Why: Yamamoto provides the first full formal representation of Arrow's theorem in proof calculus (complementing AAAI 2008 computer-aided proof), revealing the global structure of the social welfare function. This upgrades the claim's evidentiary basis from mathematical argument to formally derivable result, strengthening the alignment impossibility implication. - Connections: Enrichment only — no standalone claim warranted per curator notes. Relates to formal verification theme in domains/ai-alignment/ (machine-checked correctness). Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <3F9A1B2C-D4E5-6F7A-8B9C-0D1E2F3A4B5C>
36 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
title: "A Full Formal Representation of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem"
|
|
author: "Kazuya Yamamoto"
|
|
url: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343069
|
|
date: 2026-02-01
|
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
|
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
|
|
format: paper
|
|
status: processed
|
|
processed_by: theseus
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
|
claims_extracted: 0
|
|
enrichments: "foundations/collective-intelligence/universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective.md — added Yamamoto (2026) as evidence for formal proof calculus representation of Arrow's theorem; added to source field and body"
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
tags: [arrows-theorem, formal-proof, proof-calculus, social-choice]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Content
|
|
|
|
Constructs a full formal representation of Arrow's impossibility theorem using proof calculus in formal logic. Published in PLOS One, February 2026.
|
|
|
|
Key contribution: meticulous derivation revealing the global structure of the social welfare function central to the theorem. Complements existing proofs (computer-aided proofs from AAAI 2008, simplified proofs via Condorcet's paradox) with a full logical representation.
|
|
|
|
## Agent Notes
|
|
**Why this matters:** Machine-checkable proof of Arrow's theorem. If we claim Arrow's theorem constrains alignment, having a formally verified version strengthens the claim from "mathematical argument" to "machine-verified result."
|
|
**What surprised me:** The timing — published Feb 2026, just as the AI alignment field is grappling with Arrow's implications. The formal proof tradition is catching up to the applied work.
|
|
**What I expected but didn't find:** No connection to AI alignment in the paper itself. The formal proof is pure social choice theory.
|
|
**KB connections:** Strengthens the foundation under [[universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective]].
|
|
**Extraction hints:** May not warrant its own claim — but enriches the existing Arrow's claim with the note that the theorem now has a full formal representation (2026).
|
|
**Context:** PLOS One — open-access, peer-reviewed. Formal verification trend in mathematics.
|
|
|
|
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective
|
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides formal verification foundation for our Arrow's impossibility claim
|
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Likely enrichment to existing claim rather than standalone — add as evidence that Arrow's theorem is now formally machine-verifiable
|