bb96276c2d
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-02-20-futardio-proposal-develop-multi-option-proposals.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2.5 KiB
| type | entity_type | name | domain | status | parent_entity | platform | proposer | proposal_url | proposal_date | resolution_date | category | summary | tracked_by | created |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entity | decision_market | MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals? | internet-finance | failed | metadao | futardio | agrippa (99dZcXhrYgEmHeMKAb9ezPaBqgMdg1RjCGSfHa7BeQEX) | https://www.futard.io/proposal/J7dWFgSSuMg3BNZBAKYp3AD5D2yuaaLUmyKqvxBZgHht | 2024-02-20 | 2024-02-25 | mechanism | Proposal to develop multi-modal futarchy proposals allowing multiple mutually-exclusive outcomes beyond binary Pass/Fail for 200 META compensation | rio | 2026-03-11 |
MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?
Summary
Proposal by agrippa to develop multi-modal proposal functionality for MetaDAO's Autocrat program, enabling proposals with N mutually-exclusive outcomes rather than binary Pass/Fail. Requested 200 META distributed across 4 milestones: immediate payment upon passage, completion of conditional vault program, integration with futarch, and frontend implementation. The proposal included a 5-member multisig council (Proph3t, DeanMachine, 0xNallok, LegalizeOnionFutures, sapphire) to assess milestone completion.
Market Data
- Outcome: Failed
- Proposer: agrippa
- Proposal Account: J7dWFgSSuMg3BNZBAKYp3AD5D2yuaaLUmyKqvxBZgHht
- Proposal Number: 9
- Created: 2024-02-20
- Completed: 2024-02-25
- Autocrat Version: 0.1
Significance
This proposal represents an attempt to expand futarchy's decision-making architecture beyond binary choices. The author estimated the feature would add +12.1% to DAO value through increased decision bandwidth (+5%), pork barrel prevention (+5%), innovation hype (+2%), and fee revenue (+0.1%). The failure suggests either skepticism about these value claims, concerns about implementation complexity, or competing priorities for development resources.
The proposal also introduced the concept of a draft stage for multi-modal proposals where community members could add alternatives before market activation, positioning this as "the primary mechanism" for preventing wasteful spending in governance.
Relationship to KB
- metadao - governance mechanism proposal
- futardio - platform where proposal was submitted
- MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window - the program this proposal aimed to extend