Wrote sourced_from: into 414 claim files pointing back to their origin source. Backfilled claims_extracted: into 252 source files that were processed but missing this field. Matching uses author+title overlap against claim source: field, validated against 296 known-good pairs from existing claims_extracted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | claims_extracted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — why-would-you-make-something-like-that-up-please | @m3taversal | 2026-03-25 | internet-finance | conversation | processed | high | directed | why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise i | @m3taversal |
|
|
Conversation
@m3taversal: why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise if it is massively oversubscribed
Rio (response): Fair point, I shouldn't have stated something I wasn't sure about. Let me look into the actual allocation mechanics.
RESEARCH: P2P.me ICO allocation oversubscribed multiplier XP tier
RESEARCH: P2P.me MetaDAO ICO allocation mechanics
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise if it is massively oversubscribed Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.