teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 41 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
teleo-codex/inbox/archive/internet-finance/2025-02-10-futardio-proposal-addy-dao-proposal.md
Teleo Agents 6459163781 epimetheus: source archive restructure — 537 files reorganized 
inbox/queue/ (52 unprocessed) — landing zone for new sources
inbox/archive/{domain}/ (311 processed) — organized by domain
inbox/null-result/ (174) — reviewed, nothing extractable

One-time atomic migration. All paths preserved (wiki links use stems).

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>
2026-03-18 11:52:23 +00:00

3.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

type title author url date domain format status tags event_type processed_by processed_date enrichments_applied extraction_model extraction_notes processed_by processed_date enrichments_applied extraction_model
source Futardio: Addy DAO Proposal futard.io https://www.futard.io/proposal/8qtWAAjqKhtEBJjdY6YzkN74yddTchH2vSc7f654NtQE 2025-02-10 internet-finance data enrichment
futardio
metadao
futarchy
solana
governance
proposal rio 2025-02-10
MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md
futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md
optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles.md
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 Single proposal data point. Extracted one experimental claim about dual-track proposal types in futarchy systems. Applied three enrichments to existing mechanism claims. The explicit no-trade instruction reveals operational complexity in futarchy implementations that theory doesn't capture. rio 2026-03-16
MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md
futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md
optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles.md
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

type: source title: "Futardio: Addy DAO Proposal" author: "futard.io" url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/8qtWAAjqKhtEBJjdY6YzkN74yddTchH2vSc7f654NtQE" date: 2025-02-10 domain: internet-finance format: data status: enrichment tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance] event_type: proposal processed_by: rio processed_date: 2025-02-10 enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles.md"] extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" extraction_notes: "Single proposal data point. Extracted one experimental claim about dual-track proposal types in futarchy systems. Applied three enrichments to existing mechanism claims. The explicit no-trade instruction reveals operational complexity in futarchy implementations that theory doesn't capture." processed_by: rio processed_date: 2026-03-16 enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles.md"] extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"

Proposal Details

Summary

🎯 Key Points

The proposal aims to test new creation bundles within the Addy DAO framework, emphasizing that trading should not occur during this testing phase.

📊 Impact Analysis

👥 Stakeholder Impact

Stakeholders may experience a temporary halt in trading activities, which could affect liquidity and engagement.

📈 Upside Potential

Successfully testing these bundles could lead to improved functionality and offerings within the DAO, enhancing overall value.

📉 Risk Factors

There is a risk that the testing phase could encounter issues, potentially leading to delays or negative perceptions of the DAO's reliability.

Content

Addy DAO Proposal - Testing Bundles With New Creation - Do NOT TRADE

Raw Data

  • Proposal account: 8qtWAAjqKhtEBJjdY6YzkN74yddTchH2vSc7f654NtQE
  • Proposal number: 16
  • DAO account: GWywkp2mY2vzAaLydR2MBXRCqk2vBTyvtVRioujxi5Ce
  • Proposer: 8Cwx4yR2sFAC5Pdx2NgGHxCk1gJrtSTxJoyqVonqndhq
  • Autocrat version: 0.3
  • Completed: 2025-02-10
  • Ended: 2025-02-13

Key Facts

  • Addy DAO proposal 16 created 2025-02-10, completed 2025-02-13, status: failed
  • Proposal account: 8qtWAAjqKhtEBJjdY6YzkN74yddTchH2vSc7f654NtQE
  • DAO account: GWywkp2mY2vzAaLydR2MBXRCqk2vBTyvtVRioujxi5Ce
  • Autocrat version: 0.3
  • Proposal description: 'Testing Bundles With New Creation - Do NOT TRADE'

Key Facts

  • Addy DAO proposal 16 created 2025-02-10, completed 2025-02-13, status: failed
  • Proposal account: 8qtWAAjqKhtEBJjdY6YzkN74yddTchH2vSc7f654NtQE
  • DAO account: GWywkp2mY2vzAaLydR2MBXRCqk2vBTyvtVRioujxi5Ce
  • Autocrat version: 0.3
  • Proposal description: 'Testing Bundles With New Creation - Do NOT TRADE'