cc3f49cad0
- Applied reviewer-requested changes - Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback) Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
36 lines
No EOL
1.7 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
No EOL
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
subtype: archive
|
|
title: "Futardio Proposal: Develop Multi-Option Proposals"
|
|
url: https://forum.metadao.fi/t/futardio-proposal-develop-multi-option-proposals/158
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
|
author: Futardio
|
|
date_published: 2024-02-20
|
|
tags:
|
|
- futarchy
|
|
- metadao
|
|
- governance
|
|
- proposal
|
|
- multi-option
|
|
claims_extracted:
|
|
- multi-option-futarchy-proposals-increase-decision-bandwidth-by-enabling-parallel-evaluation-of-mutually-exclusive-alternatives
|
|
- multi-modal-conditional-vaults-may-not-introduce-new-security-risks-beyond-binary-futarchy-because-conditional-markets-do-not-compete-for-liquidity
|
|
- multi-modal-futarchy-with-draft-stages-reduces-pork-barrel-spending-by-forcing-alternatives-into-direct-market-competition
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
Futardio's unfunded MetaDAO proposal for developing multi-option futarchy functionality. The proposal outlined technical architecture for conditional vaults supporting N-way choices and made several claims about decision bandwidth, security, and governance benefits. The proposal was never funded or implemented.
|
|
|
|
## Key Claims Extracted
|
|
|
|
1. **Decision bandwidth**: Multi-option proposals increase governance throughput by enabling parallel evaluation (note: original claimed "exponential" increase, but actual scaling is linear/polynomial)
|
|
2. **Security**: Developer assertion that multi-modal vaults would not introduce new security risks (unaudited, contradicts standard security practice)
|
|
3. **Pork-barrel reduction**: Theoretical claim that draft stages with competing alternatives could reduce wasteful spending
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
- Proposal date: 2024-02-20
|
|
- Status: Unfunded/not implemented
|
|
- Platform: MetaDAO forum
|
|
- All claims remain theoretical and unvalidated |