35 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: archive
|
|
source: "Pine Analytics (@PineAnalytics)"
|
|
url: https://x.com/PineAnalytics/status/2029616320015159504
|
|
date: 2026-03-05
|
|
tags: [rio, metadao, futarchy, futardio, permissionless-launches]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Futard.io Launch Metrics (First 2 Days) — Pine Analytics
|
|
|
|
First analytics on futard.io's permissionless launch platform, MetaDAO's unbranded arm for open token launches.
|
|
|
|
## Key Metrics (first ~2 days)
|
|
|
|
- **34 ICOs created** — permissionless, anyone can launch
|
|
- **$15.6M in deposits** from 929 wallets
|
|
- **2 DAOs reached funding thresholds** — successfully funded and launched
|
|
|
|
## Behavioral Observation
|
|
|
|
"People are reluctant to be the first to put money into these raises" — first-mover hesitancy. Deposits follow momentum once someone else commits first. This maps directly to the coordination/liquidity chicken-and-egg problem identified in the futarchy adoption friction claim.
|
|
|
|
## What This Means
|
|
|
|
- 34 ICOs in 2 days vs 6 curated launches all of Q4 2025 — permissionless unlocks massive supply of launch attempts
|
|
- But only 2/34 (5.9%) reached funding thresholds — high failure rate is expected and healthy for a permissionless system
|
|
- $15.6M deposits across 929 wallets = ~$16.8K average deposit per wallet — meaningful capital, not just spam
|
|
- The brand separation strategy (futard.io vs MetaDAO) is live and functioning — failed launches don't damage MetaDAO brand
|
|
|
|
## Connections to Knowledge Base
|
|
|
|
- Validates [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability]] — the separation is working as designed
|
|
- Enriches [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — first-mover hesitancy is a new friction dimension
|
|
- Strengthens Position #4 — if 34 ICOs in 2 days becomes steady state, MetaDAO/futard.io ecosystem dominates Solana launch volume by sheer throughput
|
|
- The 5.9% success rate creates a quality filter through market mechanism — only projects that attract genuine capital survive
|