m3taversal
d4a8cfe22d
Sanctum (6 records):
- 4 full text backfills + 2 new (Logo Change CLOUD-0, Mobile App Wonder)
Dean's List (8 records):
- 6 full text backfills + 2 new (Treasury De-Risking, Liquidity Fee Structure)
ORE (4 records):
- 2 full text backfills + 2 new (USDC-ORE Boost, Sublinear Supply Function)
coal (4 records):
- 4 full text backfills
URL migration (75 files):
- All proposal_url fields migrated from dead futard.io to v1.metadao.fi
- Pattern: futard.io/proposal/{key} → v1.metadao.fi/{project}/trade/{key}
- futard.io returns 404; v1.metadao.fi returns 200
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <5551F5AF-0C5C-429F-8915-1FE74A00E019>
38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: decision
|
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
|
name: "MetaDAO: Engage in $50,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins"
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
status: failed
|
|
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
|
platform: "futardio"
|
|
proposer: "Ben Hawkins"
|
|
proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/MetaDAO/trade/US8j6iLf9GkokZbk89Bo1qnGBees5etv5sEfsfvCoZK"
|
|
proposal_date: 2024-02-13
|
|
resolution_date: 2024-02-18
|
|
category: "treasury"
|
|
summary: "Proposal to mint 1,500 META tokens in exchange for $50,000 USDC to MetaDAO treasury at $33.33 per META"
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# MetaDAO: Engage in $50,000 OTC Trade with Ben Hawkins
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
Ben Hawkins proposed to mint 1,500 META tokens to his wallet address in exchange for sending $50,000 USDC to MetaDAO's treasury, valuing META at $33.33 per token. The proposal was rejected by the futarchy markets.
|
|
|
|
## Market Data
|
|
- **Outcome:** Failed
|
|
- **Proposer:** Ben Hawkins
|
|
- **Proposal Account:** US8j6iLf9GkokZbk89Bo1qnGBees5etv5sEfsfvCoZK
|
|
- **Proposal Number:** 6
|
|
- **Created:** 2024-02-13
|
|
- **Completed:** 2024-02-18
|
|
- **Ended:** 2024-02-18
|
|
|
|
## Significance
|
|
This represents an early OTC trade proposal on MetaDAO's futarchy platform, testing the market's willingness to accept direct token minting for treasury capital. The rejection suggests the market viewed the valuation as unfavorable or the dilution as undesirable at that time.
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
- [[metadao]] - treasury governance decision
|
|
- [[futardio]] - platform where proposal was executed
|