47 lines
No EOL
1.6 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
No EOL
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# P2P.me MetaDAO ICO
|
|
|
|
**Parent Entity:** [[p2p-me]]
|
|
**Platform:** [[metadao]]
|
|
**Date:** 2026-03-26
|
|
**Status:** Active (scheduled)
|
|
**Category:** Fundraise
|
|
|
|
## Decision Parameters
|
|
|
|
**Fundraising target:** $15.5M FDV
|
|
**Token supply:** 25.8M tokens
|
|
**ICO price:** $0.60
|
|
**Liquidity at TGE:** 50% (10M ICO + 2.9M liquidity seeding)
|
|
**Valuation multiple:** 182x gross profit
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
P2P.me is a peer-to-peer USDC-to-fiat conversion platform with:
|
|
- 1,000+ liquidity providers
|
|
- <1/25,000 fraud rate
|
|
- 23,000 registered users (78% in India)
|
|
- 2,000-2,500 weekly actives
|
|
- Prior $2M VC round from Multicoin Capital and Coinbase Ventures
|
|
|
|
## Market Assessment
|
|
|
|
Pine Analytics (March 19, 2026): "Strong fundamentals, valuation stretched." Key concerns:
|
|
- $82K annual gross profit → 182x multiple
|
|
- Growth plateau since mid-2025
|
|
- 50% liquid at TGE creates liquidation risk similar to FairScale
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Significance
|
|
|
|
This ICO tests whether MetaDAO's futarchy quality filter appropriately prices:
|
|
1. **VC-backed valuation stretch:** Does Multicoin + Coinbase imprimatur override market skepticism?
|
|
2. **Good product, wrong price:** Can futarchy distinguish genuine traction from overvaluation?
|
|
3. **Structural liquidation risk:** Does 50% liquid at TGE get priced in, or does narrative override structure?
|
|
|
|
## Outcome
|
|
|
|
[To be updated after March 26, 2026]
|
|
|
|
## Related
|
|
|
|
- [[metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation]]
|
|
- [[futarchy-governed-liquidation-is-the-enforcement-mechanism-that-makes-unruggable-ICOs-credible-because-investors-can-force-full-treasury-return-when-teams-materially-misrepresent]] |