- Source: inbox/archive/2025-07-18-genius-act-stablecoin-regulation.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
37 lines
No EOL
2.3 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
No EOL
2.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: entity
|
|
entity_type: regulation
|
|
name: "GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025)"
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
status: active
|
|
legislation_number: "S.1582"
|
|
signed_date: 2025-07-18
|
|
implementation_deadline: 2027-01-18
|
|
key_provisions:
|
|
- "1:1 reserve backing (cash or short-term US Treasuries)"
|
|
- "Monthly reserve disclosure required"
|
|
- "Consumer protections for insolvency"
|
|
- "Stablecoins explicitly NOT securities"
|
|
- "Subject to Bank Secrecy Act (AML)"
|
|
- "Interest payment prohibition for issuers"
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025)
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
The GENIUS Act is the first comprehensive US stablecoin regulatory framework, signed into law on July 18, 2025. It establishes that payment stablecoins backed 1:1 by cash or short-term US Treasuries are NOT securities, creating the first clear regulatory lane for crypto-native financial infrastructure in the United States.
|
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
|
- **2025-07-18** — GENIUS Act signed into law by President
|
|
- **2026-07-18** — Deadline for supervisory agencies to publish implementing rules
|
|
- **2027-01-18** — Latest date for regulations to take effect
|
|
- **2026-02-26** — FDIC reportedly pushing narrow interpretations that could restrict crypto-native stablecoin models (CoinDesk)
|
|
- **2026-03-10** — Senators attempting to unlock stalled Digital Asset Market Clarity Act with compromise on stablecoin yield (CoinDesk)
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
- [[genius-act-creates-first-legal-precedent-distinguishing-payment-stablecoins-from-securities]] — primary claim on legal precedent
|
|
- [[stablecoin-regulatory-clarity-reduces-one-layer-of-classification-risk-for-crypto-capital-vehicles]] — implications for DAO and futarchy structures
|
|
- [[Living Capital vehicles likely fail the Howey test for securities classification because the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision eliminates the efforts of others prong]] — stablecoin clarity simplifies Howey analysis
|
|
- [[futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control]] — stablecoin treasury assets strengthen regulatory separation argument |