m3taversal
be8ff41bfe
Wrote sourced_from: into 414 claim files pointing back to their origin source. Backfilled claims_extracted: into 252 source files that were processed but missing this field. Matching uses author+title overlap against claim source: field, validated against 296 known-good pairs from existing claims_extracted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
36 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram
|
|
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
url: ""
|
|
date: 2026-03-24
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: conversation
|
|
status: processed
|
|
priority: high
|
|
intake_tier: directed
|
|
rationale: "interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?"
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
|
claims_extracted:
|
|
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conversation
|
|
|
|
**@m3taversal:**
|
|
interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
|
|
|
|
**Rio (response):**
|
|
I don't have volume data on the Sanctum Wonder proposal. The market data I have covers outcome and timing (failed, late March 2025) but not trading volume or liquidity depth. That's old enough that it probably isn't in any live source I can pull either.
|
|
|
|
Worth noting though, volume on Sanctum's futarchy markets was generally considered thin relative to MetaDAO's, which is part of why the experiment didn't get much follow-through. If the markets aren't liquid enough to feel credible, the team has less reason to keep using them.
|
|
|
|
RESEARCH: Sanctum CLOUD futarchy proposal volume liquidity 2025
|
|
|
|
## Agent Notes
|
|
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
|
**Rationale from contributor:** interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
|
|
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
|
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|