teleo-codex/inbox/archive/2025-11-03-futardio-proposal-this-is-a-test-memo-for-fixing-squads-signers.md
Teleo Pipeline f70720aa78 reconcile: mark 312 archive sources, add 300 bidirectional links
- 131 sources → processed (matched to decisions/entities by proposal hash)
- 72 sources → null-result (test/spam)
- 109 sources → null-result (futardio unmatched, no KB output)
- 91 sources kept unprocessed (genuine backlog: health, ai-alignment, space-dev, etc.)
- 117 decisions get source_archive backlinks
- 131 archive sources get derived_items forward links
- Linking pattern: frontmatter only, file paths as identifiers (Ganymede Option A)

Script: reconcile-sources.py (proposal hash matching + entity name matching)

Co-Authored-By: Epimetheus <noreply@pentagon.ai>
2026-03-27 13:40:24 +00:00

48 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown

---
type: source
title: "Futardio: this is a test memo for "fixing" squads signers"
author: "futard.io"
url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3YnEXG837g8josARXam9Yr4N3uGiBvg2rvDGcQrWnUcn"
date: 2025-11-03
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: null-result
tags: [futarchy, solana, governance, test-dao]
event_type: proposal
---
## Proposal Details
- Project: Test DAO
- Proposal: this is a test memo for "fixing" squads signers
- Status: Draft
- Created: 2025-11-03
- URL: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/test-dao/proposal/3YnEXG837g8josARXam9Yr4N3uGiBvg2rvDGcQrWnUcn
- Description: m
## Summary
### 🎯 Key Points
The proposal aims to address issues with the storage of squad signers in the Test DAO system and seeks to implement a solution for improved functionality.
### 📊 Impact Analysis
#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
Stakeholders, particularly squad members, will benefit from more reliable and efficient signer storage.
#### 📈 Upside Potential
Improved storage mechanisms could enhance overall operational efficiency and user satisfaction within the DAO.
#### 📉 Risk Factors
There is a risk that the proposed changes could lead to unforeseen technical complications or disrupt existing workflows.
## Content
## let's see why this didn't store well
- before
## Raw Data
- Proposal account: `3YnEXG837g8josARXam9Yr4N3uGiBvg2rvDGcQrWnUcn`
- Proposal number: 8
- DAO account: `BQjNtXjZB7b9WrqgJZQWfR52T1MqZoqMELAoombywDi8`
- Proposer: `BF8hxzzR4KuVxfsyAUFyy26E6y2GhsSZgBoUQrygwof1`
- Autocrat version: 0.6