Wrote sourced_from: into 414 claim files pointing back to their origin source. Backfilled claims_extracted: into 252 source files that were processed but missing this field. Matching uses author+title overlap against claim source: field, validated against 296 known-good pairs from existing claims_extracted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.5 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | processed_by | processed_date | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | extraction_model | claims_extracted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — how-much-did-deans-list-raise-on-metadao | @m3taversal | 2026-04-03 | internet-finance | conversation | processed | rio | 2026-04-15 | high | directed | How much did deans list raise on metaDAO | @m3taversal |
|
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 |
|
Conversation
@m3taversal: How much did deans list raise on metaDAO
Rio (response): Dean's List didn't raise capital through a MetaDAO ICO. They were one of the early DAOs to adopt MetaDAO's futarchy governance (alongside Drift and Future), but their relationship was about using futarchy for decision-making, not fundraising.
Their proposals on the futarchy system were operational: treasury management, liquidity fee changes, website redesigns, economic model tweaks. Not a capital raise.
If you're thinking of a specific launch or raise, happy to dig in further.
CONFIDENCE: 0.7
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: How much did deans list raise on metaDAO Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.