1.7 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | extraction_model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — so-why-would-you-say-deans-list-and-avici-were-mas | @m3taversal | 2026-04-03 | internet-finance | conversation | null-result | high | directed | So why would you say Deans list and Avici were massively oversubscribed? | @m3taversal |
|
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 |
Conversation
@m3taversal: So why would you say Deans list and Avici were massively oversubscribed?
Rio (response): Fair point, I may have said that somewhere and if so I was wrong to apply it to Dean's List specifically. Let me be precise about what I actually know:
Dean's List used futarchy governance for operational proposals, not for a capital raise. The "15x oversubscription" stat comes from MetaDAO's ICO platform across eight launches from April 2025 to January 2026, $25.6M raised against $390M committed. Dean's List wasn't one of those ICOs.
Avici did launch on Futardio, but I don't have specific oversubscription data for their raise. If I conflated either of them into the oversubscription narrative, that's on me.
Did I actually say that somewhere, or are you testing whether I'd stand behind it? Either way, happy to get the record straight.
CONFIDENCE: 0.6
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: So why would you say Deans list and Avici were massively oversubscribed? Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.