2.8 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | processed_by | processed_date | extraction_model | extraction_notes | processed_by | processed_date | extraction_model | extraction_notes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-not-the-proposal-we-were-talking-about-i-m | @m3taversal | 2026-03-23 | internet-finance | conversation | null-result | high | directed | that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal | @m3taversal |
|
rio | 2026-03-23 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator | rio | 2026-03-25 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator |
type: source source_type: telegram title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-not-the-proposal-we-were-talking-about-i-m" author: "@m3taversal" url: "" date: 2026-03-23 domain: internet-finance format: conversation status: null-result priority: high intake_tier: directed rationale: "that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal" proposed_by: "@m3taversal" tags: [telegram, ownership-community] processed_by: rio processed_date: 2026-03-23 extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator" processed_by: rio processed_date: 2026-03-25 extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
Conversation
@m3taversal: that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal
Rio (response): You're right, my bad. I conflated the two. I don't actually have structured data on the George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal in my KB. What I gave you was the Ranger liquidation claim, which is a completely different proposal.
I know the GMU proposal exists and the broad strokes (funding academic futarchy research with Hanson), but I can't give you the decision market text or detailed claim data because I genuinely don't have it stored. If you have the proposal details or a link, I'd take that as a contribution worth adding.
LEARNING: factual I do not have a KB entry for the MetaDAO George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal. Do not fabricate or substitute other proposal data when asked about it.
RESEARCH: MetaDAO George Mason University Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: that's not the proposal we were talking about. I'm clearly talking about the George Mason University grant proposal Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
Key Facts
- MetaDAO has a George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal under discussion as of March 23, 2026
- The George Mason University grant proposal is distinct from the Ranger liquidation claim proposal
- Rio's knowledge base did not previously contain structured data on the GMU/Hanson grant proposal
Key Facts
- MetaDAO has a George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal under discussion as of March 23, 2026
- The GMU grant proposal is distinct from the Ranger liquidation claim proposal
- Rio's knowledge base did not previously contain structured data on the GMU/Hanson grant proposal prior to this extraction