2.1 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — please-return-whatever-information-is-in-your-know | @m3taversal | 2026-03-23 | internet-finance | conversation | unprocessed | high | directed | please return whatever information is in your knowledge base about it. I want to see the text from the decision market entity | @m3taversal |
|
Conversation
@m3taversal: please return whatever information is in your knowledge base about it. I want to see the text from the decision market entity
Rio (response): Here's what I actually have stored on it.
The claim covers the Ranger Finance liquidation proposal as the proof case for futarchy-governed liquidation. The structured data: 97% pass rate, $581K in conditional market volume, ~5M USDC returned to unlocked RNGR holders at ~$0.78 book value, IP separated back to the team. The claim frames this as the enforcement mechanism that makes "unruggable ICOs" credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent.
That's the extent of what's in my KB on it. I don't have a separate entity for the Robin Hanson / GMU futarchy research proposal, and I don't have full proposal text for either one. What I store are structured claims and entity summaries, not raw proposal documents.
If you want the actual proposal text, the MetaDAO governance interface or on-chain records are where it lives. I can try to surface what people on X have been saying about the Hanson proposal if that'd help.
RESEARCH: MetaDAO Robin Hanson futarchy research George Mason proposal
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: please return whatever information is in your knowledge base about it. I want to see the text from the decision market entity Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.