f70720aa78
- 131 sources → processed (matched to decisions/entities by proposal hash) - 72 sources → null-result (test/spam) - 109 sources → null-result (futardio unmatched, no KB output) - 91 sources kept unprocessed (genuine backlog: health, ai-alignment, space-dev, etc.) - 117 decisions get source_archive backlinks - 131 archive sources get derived_items forward links - Linking pattern: frontmatter only, file paths as identifiers (Ganymede Option A) Script: reconcile-sources.py (proposal hash matching + entity name matching) Co-Authored-By: Epimetheus <noreply@pentagon.ai>
57 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: decision
|
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
|
name: "MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?"
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
status: failed
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
|
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
|
platform: "futardio"
|
|
proposer: "unknown"
|
|
proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/zN9Uft1zEsh9h7Wspeg5bTNirBBvtBTaJ6i5KcEnbAb"
|
|
proposal_date: 2024-11-21
|
|
resolution_date: 2024-11-25
|
|
category: strategy
|
|
summary: "Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification"
|
|
tags: ["futarchy", "futardio", "governance-filtering"]
|
|
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2024-11-21-futardio-proposal-should-metadao-create-futardio.md"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
A minimal one-sentence proposal: "Futardio is a great idea and needs to happen." Filed under the "Program" category. Failed within 4 days. No budget, no specification, no implementation plan. The proposer identity is not associated with core team members.
|
|
|
|
## Market Data
|
|
- **Outcome:** Failed (2024-11-25)
|
|
- **Autocrat version:** 0.3
|
|
- **Key participants:** Unknown proposer
|
|
|
|
## Significance
|
|
This failed proposal is more informative than many that passed. It demonstrates futarchy's quality filtering function — the market rejected an unsubstantiated proposal despite the concept (Futardio/permissionless launchpad) eventually being approved three months later with proper specification (see [[metadao-release-launchpad]]). The market distinguished between "good idea" and "well-specified proposal," rejecting the former and approving the latter.
|
|
|
|
This is concrete evidence against the criticism that futarchy markets are easily manipulated or that token holders vote based on vibes rather than substance. The failure also shows that non-founder community members can propose, even if their proposals face higher scrutiny.
|
|
|
|
Note: The later "Release a Launchpad" proposal (2025-02-26) by Proph3t and Kollan succeeded — same concept, dramatically better specification.
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
- [[metadao]] — governance decision, quality filtering
|
|
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — this proposal was too simple to pass
|
|
- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — the market correctly filtered a low-quality proposal
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Relevant Entities:
|
|
- [[metadao]] — parent organization
|
|
- [[futardio]] — the entity that was eventually created
|
|
|
|
Topics:
|
|
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
|
|
|
## Full Proposal Text
|
|
|
|
*Source: futard.io, tabled 2024-11-21*
|
|
|
|
Futardio is a great idea and needs to happen
|