m3taversal
9a3f9aca4a
Adds the new schema-defined summary field (1-3 sentences, standalone, ~200 chars) to the 8 anchor evidence claims for the homepage rotation. Unblocks Claude Design's wiki-link hover preview and dossier render when the v3 dossier UI lands. Files (one per rotation entry, anchor evidence claim only): - domains/grand-strategy/attractor-authoritarian-lock-in.md (#1) - convictions/AI-automated-software-development-is-100-percent-certain.md (#2) - foundations/collective-intelligence/AI-capability-funding-asymmetry.md (#4) - foundations/collective-intelligence/the-alignment-tax-creates-a-structural-race.md (#5) - domains/ai-alignment/agentic-Taylorism.md (#6) - foundations/collective-intelligence/multipolar-traps-thermodynamic-default.md (#7) - foundations/collective-intelligence/humanity-is-a-superorganism.md (#8) - foundations/collective-intelligence/collective-intelligence-measurable.md (#9) Excluded: - core/contribution-architecture.md (#3 anchor) — its summary lands in PR #4063 (the Phase B taxonomy update) which already modifies the description region. Avoids merge collision. Per Claude Design's KB reader v0.1 SCHEMA-PR-CHECKLIST.md: scope is the 9 rotation claims (8 here + 1 in PR #4063). Long-tail backfill across the 1000+ KB claims is future content work, not blocking. Graceful fallback to first-paragraph-truncated when summary missing remains in spec. Pentagon-Agent: Leo <D35C9237-A739-432E-A3DB-20D52D1577A9>
29 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
29 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: conviction
|
|
domain: ai-alignment
|
|
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
|
description: "Not a prediction but an observation in progress — AI is already writing and verifying code, the remaining question is scope and timeline not possibility."
|
|
summary: "Software production is moving from human-written code with AI assistance to AI-written code with human direction. The bottleneck shifts from typing capacity to specification quality, structured knowledge graphs, and evaluation infrastructure. The transition is observable in current developer workflows, not a forecast."
|
|
staked_by: Cory
|
|
stake: high
|
|
created: 2026-03-07
|
|
horizon: "2028"
|
|
falsified_by: "AI code generation plateaus at toy problems and fails to handle production-scale systems by 2028"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# AI-automated software development is 100 percent certain and will radically change how software is built
|
|
|
|
Cory's conviction, staked with high confidence on 2026-03-07.
|
|
|
|
The evidence is already visible: Claude solved a 30-year open mathematical problem (Knuth 2026). AI agents autonomously explored solution spaces with zero human intervention (Aquino-Michaels 2026). AI-generated proofs are formally verified by machine (Morrison 2026). The trajectory from here to automated software development is not speculative — it's interpolation.
|
|
|
|
The implication: when building capacity is commoditized, the scarce complement becomes *knowing what to build*. Structured knowledge — machine-readable specifications of what matters, why, and how to evaluate results — becomes the critical input to autonomous systems.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Relevant Notes:
|
|
- [[as AI-automated software development becomes certain the bottleneck shifts from building capacity to knowing what to build making structured knowledge graphs the critical input to autonomous systems]] — the claim this conviction anchors
|
|
- [[structured exploration protocols reduce human intervention by 6x because the Residue prompt enabled 5 unguided AI explorations to solve what required 31 human-coached explorations]] — evidence of AI autonomy in complex problem-solving
|
|
|
|
Topics:
|
|
- [[domains/ai-alignment/_map]]
|