fb9b18b7e2
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-02-20-futardio-proposal-develop-multi-option-proposals.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
49 lines
No EOL
2.2 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
No EOL
2.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: entity
|
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
|
name: "MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?"
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
status: failed
|
|
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
|
|
platform: "futardio"
|
|
proposer: "agrippa"
|
|
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/J7dWFgSSuMg3BNZBAKYp3AD5D2yuaaLUmyKqvxBZgHht"
|
|
proposal_date: 2024-02-20
|
|
resolution_date: 2024-02-25
|
|
category: "mechanism"
|
|
summary: "Proposal to develop multi-modal futarchy proposals allowing multiple mutually-exclusive outcomes beyond binary pass/fail"
|
|
tracked_by: rio
|
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# MetaDAO: Develop Multi-Option Proposals?
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
Proposal by agrippa to implement multi-modal proposal functionality for MetaDAO, extending the existing binary pass/fail Autocrat implementation to support N mutually-exclusive outcomes. Requested 200 META compensation across 4 milestones. The proposal argued this would increase DAO value by ~12% through improved decision bandwidth (+5%), pork-barrel reduction (+5%), and innovation hype (+2%).
|
|
|
|
## Market Data
|
|
|
|
- **Outcome:** Failed
|
|
- **Proposer:** agrippa (99dZcXhrYgEmHeMKAb9ezPaBqgMdg1RjCGSfHa7BeQEX)
|
|
- **Proposal Account:** J7dWFgSSuMg3BNZBAKYp3AD5D2yuaaLUmyKqvxBZgHht
|
|
- **Proposal Number:** 9
|
|
- **Created:** 2024-02-20
|
|
- **Completed:** 2024-02-25
|
|
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.1
|
|
|
|
## Significance
|
|
|
|
This proposal represents an early attempt to extend MetaDAO's futarchy implementation beyond binary decisions to multi-option selection problems. The failure suggests either:
|
|
1. The DAO did not value the feature at 200 META
|
|
2. Concerns about liquidity fragmentation or complexity
|
|
3. Other priorities took precedence
|
|
4. Uncertainty about timeline and deliverables
|
|
|
|
The proposer's architectural argument—that conditional vaults should support arbitrary N outcomes without hard limits—influenced subsequent thinking about futarchy mechanism design.
|
|
|
|
## Relationship to KB
|
|
|
|
- [[metadao]] - governance decision on mechanism development
|
|
- [[futardio]] - platform where proposal was submitted
|
|
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] - the base implementation this would extend |