teleo-codex/domains/ai-alignment/representation-trajectory-geometry-distinguishes-deceptive-from-sincere-alignment-without-creating-adversarial-attack-surfaces.md

{
  "action": "flag_duplicate",
  "candidates": [
    "representation-trajectory-geometry-distinguishes-deceptive-from-sincere-alignment-without-creating-adversarial-attack-surfaces.md",
    "trajectory-monitoring-dual-edge-geometric-concentration.md",
    "multi-layer-ensemble-probes-improve-monitoring-robustness-for-closed-source-models-but-provide-no-structural-protection-for-open-weights-models-against-white-box-SCAV-generalization-attacks.md"
  ],
  "reasoning": "The reviewer explicitly stated that 'The third enrichment (trajectory-monitoring file) appears to substantially duplicate content already present in that file's existing 'Extending Evidence' section dated 2026-04-22 from the same source.' The claim being fixed is 'representation-trajectory-geometry-distinguishes-deceptive-from-sincere-alignment-without-creating-adversarial-attack-surfaces.md'. The source material itself mentions 'Qualifies: `representation-trajectory-geometry-distinguishes-deceptive-from-sincere-alignment-without-creating-adversarial-attack-surfaces.md` — may need updating (trajectory geometry DOES create attack surface, just harder to exploit)' and 'Extends: `trajectory-monitoring-dual-edge-geometric-concentration.md`'. The content of the challenging evidence is also very similar to the core idea of 'multi-layer-ensemble-probes-improve-monitoring-robustness-for-closed-source-models-but-provide-no-structural-protection-for-open-weights-models-against-white-box-SCAV-generalization-attacks.md'."
}