teleo-infrastructure/docs/queue.md
m3taversal d2aec7fee3
Some checks are pending
CI / lint-and-test (push) Waiting to run
feat: reorganize repo with clear directory boundaries and agent ownership
Move scattered root-level files into categorized directories:
- deploy/ — deployment + mirror scripts (Ship)
- scripts/ — one-off backfills + migrations (Ship)
- research/ — nightly research + prompts (Ship)
- docs/ — all operational documentation (shared)

Delete 3 dead cron scripts replaced by pipeline daemon:
- batch-extract-50.sh, evaluate-trigger.sh, extract-cron.sh

Add CODEOWNERS mapping every path to its owning agent.
Add README with directory structure, ownership table, and VPS layout.
Update deploy.sh paths to match new structure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-14 18:20:13 +01:00

3.1 KiB

Ops Queue

Outstanding work items visible to all agents. Everything here goes through eval — adding items, claiming them, closing them. Git history is the audit trail.

How it works

  1. Add items — any agent can propose new items via PR
  2. Claim items — move status to claimed with your name, via PR
  3. Close items — remove the row and note what PR resolved it, via PR
  4. Priority — critical items block other work; high items should be next; medium/low are opportunistic

Active

Item Type Priority Claimed Notes
Rename ai-alignment domain → ai-systems rename high Directory, CLAUDE.md, webhook.py domain routing, claim frontmatter, domain map. Support both names during transition.
24 claims with inflated confidence levels audit high Foundations audit finding. 24 claims rated higher than evidence supports. List in maps/analytical-toolkit.md audit section.
8 foundation gaps (mechanism design, platform economics, transaction costs, info aggregation, auction theory, community formation, selfplex, CAS) content high Partial coverage exists for some. See maps/analytical-toolkit.md.
Update skills/evaluate.md with tiered eval architecture docs high Document triage criteria, tier definitions, model routing. After Ganymede validates parallel eval pipeline.
Update collective-agent-core.md — lever vs purpose framework + 20% posting rule content medium From Cory voicenotes. Lever = the mechanism an agent uses. Purpose = why it exists. 20% of posting should be original synthesis.
Identity reframe PRs need merging review medium #149 Theseus, #153 Astra, #157 Rio, #158 Leo (needs rebase), #159 Vida. All have eval reviews.
16 processed sources missing domain field fix low Fixed for internet-finance batch (PR #171). Audit remaining sources.
Theseus disconfirmation protocol PR content medium Scoped during B1 exercise. Theseus to propose.
Research Hermes Agent by Nous Research — deep dive for KB extraction research high Theseus Source: NousResearch/hermes-agent (GitHub). Research brief in agents/theseus/musings/research-hermes-agent-nous.md. Extract: (1) Skill extraction as convergent learning mechanism. (2) Self-evolution + human review gates = our governance model. (3) 3+ layer memory convergence. (4) Individual self-improvement ≠ collective knowledge accumulation. (5) Enrich Agentic Taylorism — skills = Taylor's instruction cards. Domains: ai-alignment + collective-intelligence.

Rules

  • One row per item. If an item is too big, split it into smaller items.
  • Don't hoard claims. If you claimed something and can't get to it within 2 sessions, unclaim it.
  • Close promptly. When the PR merges, remove the row in the same PR or the next one.
  • No duplicates. Check before adding. If an item is already tracked, update the existing row.
  • Critical items first. If a critical item exists, it takes precedence over all other work.