teleo/teleo-infrastructure
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
teleo-infrastructure/docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-suite-review-current.md

3.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Telegram Handler Direct-Claim Suite Review

Generated UTC: 2026-07-13T00:42:00Z

Result

  • Runtime path: pass_runtime=True; all six direct-claim prompts returned replies from live VPS GatewayRunner using a temporary leoclean profile.
  • Strict benchmark score: 6/6 in all three post-deploy trials (18/18 replies).
  • Telegram post: false.
  • Live profile changed: false.
  • Production DB apply executed: false.
  • DB counts before and after: 1837,4145,4916,4670,26 -> 1837,4145,4916,4670,26.
  • Service before/after run: active/running, MainPID=2403328, NRestarts=0, ExecMainStartTimestamp=Sun 2026-07-12 09:14:10 UTC.

Core Finding

Leo now returns all six no-context replies and keeps the VPS stable across three fresh post-deploy runs. The scorer accepts equivalent truthful language while rejecting the incompatible legacy add_edge follow-up.

  • DC-05: all three post-deploy no-post answers include a complete DB readback: receipt and propose a safe new or matching strict staging canary. The retained Telegram-visible answer predates the repair and still fails this one check.

Scenario Assessment

  • DC-01: pass - Proposed/approved/applied split is correct; names two applied rows, three approved-but-unapplied rows, 14 pending, and 7 canceled; includes follow-up and authorization boundary.
  • DC-02: pass - Helmer 7 Powers is approved/staged or packet-ready but not canonical; proposal a64df080 has empty applied_at; canonical public.* rows are absent.
  • DC-03: pass - Decision-matrix path is not shipped; matrix tables are absent; m3ta reviewer sign-off is not a matrix vote.
  • DC-04: pass - Not a single-cause pointer diagnosis; separates Telegram/local file refs, proposal refs, document evaluations, review status, and canonical public.sources.
  • DC-05: pass_repeated - Three consecutive post-deploy no-post answers are correct; the older Telegram-visible capture remains historical failure evidence.
  • DC-06: pass - Direct SOUL.md edit is runtime/rendered artifact drift, not canonical identity; canonical change requires DB rows plus render/sync/postflight proof.

Follow-Up Challenge

  • The latest report and score supersede the older 6/6 review for current handler status.

Next Actions

  • Keep the three-trial repeat proof as the clean-session regression gate.
  • Retest DC-05 visibly in Telegram only with separate exact message authorization.
  • Reopen immediately if DC-02 stops recognizing a64df080 as approved/unapplied, DC-03 infers matrix approval while matrix tables are absent, any DC answer omits Next Cory-style follow-up:, or the read-only suite mutates DB/service state.
  • This pass does not authorize production apply of Helmer, mapped rich packets, Rio strategy, governance/concept schema, or any canonical public.* mutation.

Evidence Files

  • Direct-claim handler report: docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-suite-current.json
  • Strict score: docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-suite-score-current.md
  • Repeated post-deploy proof: docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/leo-post-deploy-direct-claim-repeat-current.md
  • Follow-up challenge report: docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-direct-claim-followup-current.json
  • State image: docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/leo-db-state-26-direct-claim-handler.svg