1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
Targeted Working Leo Handler Check
Result
After PR #108 deployed at merge 6eb5777124515304a1c1d1901a9177064f1ed175,
five high-risk m3taversal-style prompts ran through the live VPS GatewayRunner
with a temporary leoclean profile.
- Strict result:
2/5. - Passed: proposal readiness (
OOS-04) and shared claims versus agent-owned positions (OOS-11). - Failed: restart/runtime proof tiers (
OOS-10), bounded source intake (OOS-14), and heterogeneous packet composition (OOS-06).
Concrete Gaps
- The restart answer omitted the exact handler, Telegram-delivery, and canonical
mutation proof tiers and did not name
state.db/ session JSONL continuity. - The intake answer invented
author,title,publisher, and publication-date fields on the current canonical source row and omitted the build-only compiler boundary. - The composition answer proposed a claim edge on a belief row, assigned
applied_atto each step instead of the proposal receipt, included unsupported policy/belief writes in the apply sequence, and used321words.
Safety Readback
- Canonical counts stayed
1837/4145/4670/4916/26. leoclean-gateway.servicestayed active/running on PID3166667with zero restarts and the same start timestamp.- The temporary profile was removed.
- No Telegram message or production DB apply ran.
The accompanying repair tightens current source fields, source identity, belief-edge constraints, unsupported apply surfaces, proposal-level receipts, restart proof tiers, and semantic scoring before another live run.