teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

pipeline: clean 1 stale queue duplicates

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-24 18:30:01 +00:00
parent 2b2dd517ac
commit 8526b04c31
1 changed files with 0 additions and 44 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

44
inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md
View file

@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-24
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: enrichment
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-24
enrichments_applied: ["sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md", "futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Conversation
**@m3taversal:**
interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
**Rio (response):**
I don't have volume data on the Sanctum Wonder proposal. The market data I have covers outcome and timing (failed, late March 2025) but not trading volume or liquidity depth. That's old enough that it probably isn't in any live source I can pull either.
Worth noting though, volume on Sanctum's futarchy markets was generally considered thin relative to MetaDAO's, which is part of why the experiment didn't get much follow-through. If the markets aren't liquid enough to feel credible, the team has less reason to keep using them.
RESEARCH: Sanctum CLOUD futarchy proposal volume liquidity 2025
## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
## Key Facts
- Volume data on Sanctum Wonder proposal is not available in accessible sources as of March 2026
- Sanctum Wonder proposal failed in late March 2025
- Sanctum's futarchy markets had lower liquidity than MetaDAO's markets