theseus: extract from 2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Domain: ai-alignment - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4) Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba4ac4a73e
commit
8e27f3dc1a
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Philosophical critique of alignment-as-technical-problem from philosophy of science perspective. One composite claim extracted covering the five-point decomposition. Three enrichments to existing coordination/specification claims. Full text paywalled—extraction based on abstract and secondary discussion. The operationalization impossibility argument is notably stronger than most coordination critiques."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue