teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1
teleo-codex/entities/internet-finance/p2p-me.md
m3taversal 018ee566e2 rio: standardize all 10 ownership coin entities with portfolio dashboard schema 
- What: Rewrote all 10 ownership coin entity files (mtnCapital, OmniPair, Umbra,
  Avici, Loyal, ZKFG, Paystream/PAYS, Solomon/SOLO, Ranger, P2P.me) with
  standardized frontmatter schema for dashboard consumption. Deduplicated
  9 redundant files (Ranger had 4, P2P had 4, Umbra had 2, OmniPair had 2).
  Updated all wiki links across decisions/, sectors/, and entities/ to point
  to canonical files.
- Why: m3ta requested portfolio dashboard. Entity stubs had near-zero structured
  data. Dashboard rendering requires standardized schema with raise amounts,
  token addresses, traction metrics, and chain data.
- Gaps flagged: Token addresses for 5 coins, treasury multisig addresses for all 10,
  LP pool addresses, mtnCapital raise details. Phase 2 cron script will auto-fill
  on-chain numerics.

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <244BA05F-3AA3-4079-8C59-6D68A77C76FE>
2026-04-17 13:23:42 +01:00

4.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

name ticker type subtype domain status launch_platform launch_date raise chain holders traction liquidation tracked_by
P2P.me $P2P entity ownership-coin internet-finance active metadao-curated 2026-03-26
amount_raised_usd amount_committed_usd oversubscription_ratio
6000000 7300000 1.1
token_address network market_cap_usd price_usd circulating_supply total_supply treasury_multisig_usd treasury_multisig_address lp_usdc_protocol_controlled_usd lp_pool_addresses equity_value_usd data_updated
null solana null null null 25800000 null null null
null null
name role estimated_pct
Multicoin Capital lead null
name role estimated_pct
Coinbase Ventures lead null
name role estimated_pct
Top 10 wallets early 93
revenue_monthly_usd customers key_metrics
48000 23000
27% MoM growth sustained over 16 months
NPS: 80
Peak monthly volume: $3.95M (Feb 2026)
Annualized revenue: ~$578K
Monthly burn: $175K (25-person team)
Runway: ~34 months
Fraud rate: <1/1000 transactions
Sub-90-second settlement
6 countries live: India (78%), Brazil (15%), Argentina, Indonesia, Venezuela, Mexico
336 contributors, 93% from 10 wallets
FDV: ~$15.5M ($0.60/token, 10M sold)
50% liquid at launch
Team unlock: performance-based 2x-32x price triggers
Investor lock: 12 months then staggered over 12 months
date return_per_dollar reason
null null null
rio

P2P.me

P2P.me is a non-custodial peer-to-peer USDC-to-fiat onramp protocol targeting emerging markets with capital controls, using ZK-TLS-based Proof-of-Credibility verification for trustless fiat payment confirmation over legacy banking rails (UPI, PIX, QRIS). Most recent MetaDAO curated ICO (March 2026), raised $6M with only 1.1x oversubscription — the lowest on the platform, reflecting market maturation from the 200x+ ratios of earlier launches. Backed by Multicoin Capital and Coinbase Ventures; 2/3 of capital from institutional sources.

Business Model

  • Permissionless fiat on/off-ramp via Circles of Trust model
  • Local operators stake capital, recruit merchants, earn 0.2% of monthly volume
  • Country launch cost compressed from $40K to $400; launch timeline from 45 days to 10 days
  • Related product: Coins.me (consumer neo-bank built on P2P Protocol infrastructure)

Technology

  • ZK-TLS Proof-of-Credibility for fiat payment attestation
  • Integration with UPI (India), PIX (Brazil), QRIS (Indonesia)
  • AI operations layer built on 2.5-year operational playbook
  • Open-source SDK planned for third-party integration

Expansion

  • 6 countries live: India, Brazil, Argentina, Venezuela, Mexico, Indonesia
  • 16 countries in active pipeline (Colombia, Peru, Nigeria, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, etc.)
  • Target: 40 countries within 18 months

Controversy

The P2P team placed a bet on Polymarket predicting their ICO would reach $6M in commits — potential insider trading. MetaDAO extended the sale 2 days and offered full refunds; ~$200K claimed. Pine Analytics flagged a 182x gross profit multiple valuation; team acknowledged concern as "completely valid."

Gaps

  • Token address needed for on-chain tracking
  • Treasury multisig address unknown
  • LP pool addresses needed
  • Current market cap and price data needed
  • Monthly gross profit inconsistent ($4.5K-$13.3K range)

Timeline

  • 2024-03 — Protocol launched, began operations
  • 2024-12 — Launch in initial emerging markets
  • 2025-09 — Brazil launch: 45 days, 3 people, $40K investment
  • 2025-11 — Argentina launch: 30 days, 2 people, $20K investment
  • 2026-01 — Venezuela launch: 15 days, no local team, $400 investment
  • 2026-02 — Mexico launch: 10 days, no local team, $400 investment
  • 2026-03-26 — Completed $6M ICO through MetaDAO: 336 contributors, 93% from 10 wallets, 1.1x oversubscribed
  • 2026-03 — Polymarket controversy; MetaDAO offered refunds, ~$200K claimed

Relevant Notes:

Topics: