1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | date | domain | format | status | proposed_by | contribution_type | tags | processed_by | processed_date | extraction_model | extraction_notes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram-contribution | Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder add | @m3taversal | 2026-03-30 | internet-finance | contribution | null-result | @m3taversal | source-submission |
|
rio | 2026-03-30 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator |
Source: Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder b
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat. Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
Verbatim User Message
@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze
Rio's Context
Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder betting on own ICO outcome on Polymarket, states they would have pushed against it if known earlier, describes intervention approach. https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 — attributed to @m3taversal
Key Facts
- P2P founder bet on their own ICO outcome on Polymarket in March 2026
- MetaDAO co-founder Proph3t stated they would have pushed against this if known earlier
- The incident required public statement and intervention from MetaDAO leadership