36 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram-contribution
|
|
title: "Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder add"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
date: 2026-03-30
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: contribution
|
|
status: null-result
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
contribution_type: source-submission
|
|
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'governance']
|
|
processed_by: rio
|
|
processed_date: 2026-03-30
|
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
|
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Source: Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder b
|
|
|
|
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
|
|
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
|
|
|
|
## Verbatim User Message
|
|
|
|
@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze
|
|
|
|
## Rio's Context
|
|
|
|
Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder betting on own ICO outcome on Polymarket, states they would have pushed against it if known earlier, describes intervention approach. https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 — attributed to @m3taversal
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Key Facts
|
|
- P2P founder bet on their own ICO outcome on Polymarket in March 2026
|
|
- MetaDAO co-founder Proph3t stated they would have pushed against this if known earlier
|
|
- The incident required public statement and intervention from MetaDAO leadership
|