1.6 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | priority | intake_tier | rationale | proposed_by | tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | telegram | Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-not-true-curated-launches-had-significantl | @m3taversal | 2026-04-03 | internet-finance | conversation | unprocessed | high | directed | that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically | @m3taversal |
|
Conversation
@m3taversal: that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically
Rio (response): Fair point. The curated MetaDAO ICOs pulled $25.6M against $390M in committed demand, 15x oversubscription across eight launches. Individual raises like Dean's List and Avici were massively oversubscribed. So yeah, committed capital on the permissioned side dwarfed Futardio cult's $11.4M in absolute terms.
What I should have said is that $11.4M in a single day is impressive for a permissionless memecoin launch specifically. Not that it beat the curated track.
CONFIDENCE: 0.85
LEARNING: factual Curated MetaDAO ICOs had significantly more committed capital than Futardio cult's $11.4M launch. Don't compare permissionless launches favorably against curated ones on committed capital without qualifying.
Agent Notes
Why archived: Tagged exchange in ownership community. Rationale from contributor: that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically Intake tier: directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning Triage: Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.