36 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: telegram
|
|
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-not-true-curated-launches-had-significantl"
|
|
author: "@m3taversal"
|
|
url: ""
|
|
date: 2026-04-03
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: conversation
|
|
status: unprocessed
|
|
priority: high
|
|
intake_tier: directed
|
|
rationale: "that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically"
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conversation
|
|
|
|
**@m3taversal:**
|
|
that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically
|
|
|
|
**Rio (response):**
|
|
Fair point. The curated MetaDAO ICOs pulled $25.6M against $390M in committed demand, 15x oversubscription across eight launches. Individual raises like Dean's List and Avici were massively oversubscribed. So yeah, committed capital on the permissioned side dwarfed Futardio cult's $11.4M in absolute terms.
|
|
|
|
What I should have said is that $11.4M in a single day is impressive for a permissionless memecoin launch specifically. Not that it beat the curated track.
|
|
|
|
CONFIDENCE: 0.85
|
|
|
|
LEARNING: factual Curated MetaDAO ICOs had significantly more committed capital than Futardio cult's $11.4M launch. Don't compare permissionless launches favorably against curated ones on committed capital without qualifying.
|
|
|
|
## Agent Notes
|
|
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
|
**Rationale from contributor:** that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically
|
|
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
|
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|