m3taversal
be8ff41bfe
Wrote sourced_from: into 414 claim files pointing back to their origin source. Backfilled claims_extracted: into 252 source files that were processed but missing this field. Matching uses author+title overlap against claim source: field, validated against 296 known-good pairs from existing claims_extracted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.2 KiB
1.2 KiB
| type | source_type | title | author | url | date | domain | format | status | proposed_by | contribution_type | tags | claims_extracted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | x-tweet | @jabranthelawyer — shared via Telegram by @m3taversal | @jabranthelawyer | https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 | 2026-03-30 | internet-finance | social-media | processed | @m3taversal | source-submission |
|
|
@jabranthelawyer — Tweet/Thread
Shared by @m3taversal via Telegram. Source URL: https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20
Content
Few thoughts if I was MetaDAO's lawyer:
-
P2P did something objectively wrong. Whether illegal TBC but possible
-
Regulators look at conduct and by exercising control, it creates bad precedent in two ways here:
A) They've moved from simply a "fundraising platform" to one actively involved in raise
B) By stating that founders past experience + is basis to continue raise, they've created a due diligence obligation on themselves
- Best to check the indemnities founders provide to ensure they're covered because all of this has just increased MetaDAO's risk profile unnecessarily imo