m3taversal
be8ff41bfe
Wrote sourced_from: into 414 claim files pointing back to their origin source. Backfilled claims_extracted: into 252 source files that were processed but missing this field. Matching uses author+title overlap against claim source: field, validated against 296 known-good pairs from existing claims_extracted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
35 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
type: source
|
|
source_type: x-tweet
|
|
title: "@jabranthelawyer — shared via Telegram by @m3taversal"
|
|
author: "@jabranthelawyer"
|
|
url: "https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20"
|
|
date: 2026-03-30
|
|
domain: internet-finance
|
|
format: social-media
|
|
status: processed
|
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
|
contribution_type: source-submission
|
|
tags: ['telegram-shared', 'x-tweet', 'governance']
|
|
claims_extracted:
|
|
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# @jabranthelawyer — Tweet/Thread
|
|
|
|
Shared by @m3taversal via Telegram.
|
|
Source URL: https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20
|
|
|
|
## Content
|
|
|
|
Few thoughts if I was MetaDAO's lawyer:
|
|
|
|
1. P2P did something objectively wrong. Whether illegal TBC but possible
|
|
|
|
2. Regulators look at conduct and by exercising control, it creates bad precedent in two ways here:
|
|
|
|
A) They've moved from simply a "fundraising platform" to one actively involved in raise
|
|
|
|
B) By stating that founders past experience + is basis to continue raise, they've created a due diligence obligation on themselves
|
|
|
|
- Best to check the indemnities founders provide to ensure they're covered because all of this has just increased MetaDAO's risk profile unnecessarily imo
|