teleo-codex/entities/internet-finance/metadao-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md
Teleo Agents e761ca0c89 rio: extract from 2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 6)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
2026-03-12 13:10:43 +00:00

3.3 KiB

type entity_type name domain status parent_entity platform proposer proposal_url proposal_date resolution_date category summary key_metrics tracked_by created
entity decision_market MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy? internet-finance passed metadao futardio joebuild https://www.futard.io/proposal/CF9QUBS251FnNGZHLJ4WbB2CVRi5BtqJbCqMi47NX1PG 2024-01-24 2024-01-29 mechanism Proposal to replace CLOB-based conditional markets with AMM architecture to improve liquidity and reduce state rent costs
budget timeline team
400 META on passing + 800 META on completion 3 weeks development + 1 week review joebuild (program), 0xNalloK (frontend), TBD (review)
rio 2026-03-11

MetaDAO: Develop AMM Program for Futarchy?

Summary

Proposal to migrate MetaDAO's futarchy implementation from Central Limit Order Books (CLOBs) to Automated Market Makers (AMMs) to address three structural problems: liquidity fragmentation from wide bid-ask spreads, manipulation vulnerability through midpoint pushing and wash trading, and state rent costs of 3.75 SOL per market pair.

Market Data

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Proposer: joebuild
  • Created: 2024-01-24
  • Completed: 2024-01-29
  • Budget: 400 META on passing + 800 META on completion (1,200 META total)
  • Timeline: 3 weeks development + 1 week review

Proposal Details

Problem Statement:

  1. Lack of liquidity: Wide valuation uncertainty discourages limit orders near midpoint
  2. Manipulation susceptibility: 1 META can push midpoint; VWAP vulnerable to wash trading
  3. State rent costs: 3.75 SOL per market pair = 135-225 SOL annually ($11,475-$19,125)

Solution:

  • AMM with liquidity-weighted price metric (more liquidity = more weight to current price)
  • High fees (3-5%) to incentivize LPs and deter wash trading
  • Proposers lock initial liquidity and set starting pass/fail prices
  • Near-zero state rent costs

Implementation Scope:

  • Write basic AMM tracking liquidity-weighted average price
  • Integrate AMM into autocrat + conditional vault
  • Feature to pause swaps and return positions after verdict
  • Feature to close AMMs and return state rent SOL
  • Loosen time restrictions on proposal creation (currently 50 slots)
  • Auto-revert to fail if proposal instructions don't execute after X days

Team:

  • joebuild: program development
  • 0xNalloK: frontend integration
  • TBD: expert review

Significance

First major architectural change to MetaDAO's futarchy implementation since launch. The migration from CLOBs to AMMs represents a fundamental shift in how conditional markets operate - from discrete order books to continuous pricing curves. The proposal explicitly prioritizes liquidity and manipulation resistance over features like one-sided liquidity provision.

The state rent economics are notable: at 3-5 proposals/month, CLOB costs compound to $11K-$19K annually, making AMMs economically necessary at scale.

Relationship to KB