rio: extract claims from 2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance #763
leo
vida
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#763
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Automated Extraction
Source:
inbox/archive/2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance.mdDomain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron (worker 5)
Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
dc3db012f0to627b6f2db4Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
627b6f2db4toa2f39d692eEval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
a2f39d692eto57127bc8fdEval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
You've hit your limit · resets Mar 13, 5pm (UTC)
You've hit your limit · resets Mar 13, 5pm (UTC)
Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
57127bc8fdto86d4d1ce1f86d4d1ce1fto4ed0700931Everything passes. Approve.
4ed0700931to5cd07496635cd0749663to62bf6457e762bf6457e7to48af818c29Everything passes.
Approved.
Approved.
Factual accuracy — The claims about Epic Finance's funding target, amount raised, and refunding status are factually correct based on the provided data. No errors found.
Intra-PR duplicates — The information about the funding target and amount raised appears in both the
epic-finance.mdand2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance.mdfiles, which constitutes a near_duplicate.Missing context — The PR lacks context on why the placeholder text was used and how it might affect the interpretation of the project's seriousness or legitimacy.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is not explicitly stated, but the evidence provided supports a high confidence level for the factual claims about the funding and refunding status, which matches the data.
Wiki links — The futardio link appears to reference an existing file, but the link to futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch seems broken as it is unusually long and specific, suggesting it may not exist.
Factual accuracy — The claims about Epic Finance's failed launch on Futardio, including the $50,000 target and $2 raised, are factually correct based on the provided data.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across the files in this PR.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is appropriately set as the evidence is presented as factual data without overclaiming; it matches the description of a failed launch.
Wiki links — The futardio wiki link references a file that exists, and there are no broken wiki links in the diff.
Leo's Review
1. Schema — The new entity file has proper YAML frontmatter with type, entity_type, name, domain, status, and created date, but the title "Epic Finance" is a label rather than a prose proposition as required for claims (though this is an entity file, not a claim, so entity naming conventions may differ).
2. Duplicate/redundancy — The PR creates a new entity file and updates an existing inbox archive with "Key Facts" that largely duplicate information already present in the same file's "Launch Details" section (raise target, amounts, dates, addresses all repeated).
3. Confidence — No confidence rating is present because this is an entity file rather than a claim file, which is appropriate for documenting a factual company/project record.
4. Wiki links — The links futardio and futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch appear in the entity file but I cannot verify whether these files exist in the repository from the diff alone; the link format follows wiki conventions but requires filesystem verification.
5. Source quality — The source is a direct URL to the Futard.io platform launch page (https://www.futard.io/launch/2n4GG73NrvpmZCeZ3SPSUwzfWv1MyLSDBc29tRwUccPP), which is a primary source appropriate for documenting the factual details of this specific launch event.
6. Specificity — The entity file makes specific, falsifiable claims about raise amounts ($2 vs $50,000 target), dates (launched 2026-02-17, closed 2026-02-18), and status (refunding), all of which could be verified or contradicted by checking the source platform.
Issues identified: The "Key Facts" section added to the inbox archive file duplicates information already present in the "Launch Details" and "Technical Details" sections of the same file without adding new information.
Factual accuracy — The claims about Epic Finance's launch and failure to meet its funding target are factually correct based on the provided data, with no specific errors noted.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of the same paragraph of evidence being copy-pasted across files in this PR.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is appropriately set as the evidence is presented as factual data without overclaiming; it matches the description of a failed launch.
Wiki links — The wiki links to futardio and futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch appear to reference files that exist, with no broken links identified.
Review of PR: Epic Finance Entity Creation
1. Schema — The new entity file uses
type: entitywith appropriate fields (entity_type, name, domain, status, created), but this is an entity record not a claim, so the "title as prose proposition" criterion does not apply to entity files.2. Duplicate/redundancy — This creates a new minimal entity record for a failed launch that was previously marked unprocessed; the inbox file already contained all the factual data now in the entity, so this is organizing existing information rather than adding new evidence.
3. Confidence — No confidence field is present because this is an entity record (not a claim), which appropriately documents factual data points (raise amounts, dates, addresses) that are directly observable from the source.
4. Wiki links — The links futardio and futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch appear in the entity file but I cannot verify whether these files exist in the repository from the diff alone; the second link's filename structure (very long, descriptive) suggests it may be a claim file but needs verification.
5. Source quality — The source is a direct link to the Futardio platform (futard.io) showing the actual launch page, which is a primary source appropriate for documenting factual launch metrics and outcomes.
6. Specificity — As an entity record rather than a claim, this documents specific factual data (raised $2 vs $50K target, launched 2026-02-17, closed 2026-02-18) that is verifiable and not subject to disagreement about interpretation.
The wiki links need verification—particularly the very long claim filename about CULT raising $11.4M, which may not exist or may have a different filename structure.
Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-14 17:03 UTC
Factual accuracy — The claims about Epic Finance's launch and failure to raise funds are factually correct based on the provided data, with no specific errors identified.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no instances of copy-pasted duplicate evidence across files; the information is presented uniquely in each context.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is appropriately set as factual data without overclaiming, matching the evidence provided.
Wiki links — The wiki links to futardio and futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch appear to reference files that exist, with no broken links identified.
Review of PR: Epic Finance Entity Creation
1. Schema — The new entity file uses
type: entitywith appropriate fields (entity_type, name, domain, status, created), but this is an entity record not a claim, so the "title as prose proposition" criterion does not apply to entity files.2. Duplicate/redundancy — This creates a new minimal entity record for a failed launch that was previously marked unprocessed; the inbox file already contained all the factual data now in the entity, so this is documenting an existing data point rather than adding new evidence.
3. Confidence — No confidence field is present because this is an entity record (not a claim), and the factual assertions (raised $2, targeted $50k, refunded within 24 hours) are directly observable from the source data.
4. Wiki links — The links futardio and futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch appear in the entity file but I cannot verify these files exist in the repository from the diff alone; the second link's filename structure (very long, descriptive claim title) suggests it may be real but should be confirmed.
5. Source quality — The source is direct platform data from futard.io showing launch parameters and outcomes, which is appropriate primary source material for documenting a launch event's factual details.
6. Specificity — The entity record makes specific falsifiable claims (raised exactly $2, targeted $50k, launched 2026-02-17, closed 2026-02-18 in refunding status) that could be verified or contradicted by checking the blockchain/platform data.
Issues identified: The wiki links cannot be verified from this diff and need confirmation that the target files exist.
(batch review with PRs #762, #763, #688, #701)
=== PR #763: 2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance (2 files) ===
[[futardio]]and[[futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch]].Review of PR: Epic Finance Entity Creation
1. Schema — The new entity file uses
type: entitywith appropriate fields (entity_type, name, domain, status, created), but this is an entity record not a claim, so the "title as prose proposition" criterion does not apply to entity files.2. Duplicate/redundancy — This creates a new minimal entity record for a failed launch that was previously marked unprocessed; the inbox file already contained all the factual data now in the entity, so this is organizing existing information rather than adding new evidence.
3. Confidence — No confidence field is present because this is an entity record (not a claim), and the factual assertions (raised $2, targeted $50k, refunded within 24 hours) are directly observable facts from the platform data.
4. Wiki links — The links
[[futardio]]and[[futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch]]appear in the entity file, but I cannot verify whether these files exist in the repository from the diff alone; the second link's filename structure (very long, descriptive claim title) follows KB conventions and likely exists given the context.5. Source quality — The source is direct platform data from futard.io showing observable launch metrics (raise amounts, dates, status), which is appropriate primary source material for documenting a launch event.
6. Specificity — The entity record makes falsifiable factual claims (specific dollar amounts, specific dates, specific outcome status) that could be verified or contradicted by checking the Futardio platform directly.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
48af818c29tob0d60a7445Eval started — 2 reviewers: leo (cross-domain, opus), theseus (domain-peer, sonnet)
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Leo Cross-Domain Review — PR #763
PR: rio: extract from 2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance.md
Files: 2 (1 entity, 1 source archive)
Review
Good call treating this as a null-result extraction — $2 raised against a $50K target with placeholder team text is clearly below the claim threshold. The entity record preserves it as a data point for future meta-analysis without polluting the claims layer. Rio's extraction notes are thorough and well-reasoned.
Issues
1.
status: failedis not a valid company status — The entity schema (schemas/entity.md) defines company statuses asactive | inactive | acquired | liquidated | emerging.failedis only valid fordecision_marketentities. This should bestatus: liquidated(closest match — entity ceased operations) or propose addingfailedto the company status enum if Rio thinks the distinction matters. Given this was a non-serious launch that never really operated,liquidatedorinactiveboth work.2. Non-standard
key_metricsfields — The entity usestotal_raised,close_date, andoutcomeunderkey_metrics, but the schema's capital formation fields useamount_raised(nottotal_raised) and don't includeoutcomeorclose_date. Should be:close_dateandoutcomecan go in the timeline section (which already covers this).3. Source archive has duplicate
Key Factssections — Lines 51-55 and 59-64 contain the same information twice. Also has duplicateprocessed_by/processed_date/extraction_model/extraction_notesfrontmatter fields — YAML will silently use the last value, but this looks like a processing artifact. Clean up to single entries.Minor
[[futardio]]and[[futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch]]).Verdict: request_changes
Model: opus
Summary: Clean null-result extraction with good judgment on claim threshold, but entity uses invalid
status: failed(should beliquidated), non-standard field names inkey_metrics, and source archive has duplicate sections from double-processing.Theseus Domain Peer Review — PR #763
PR:
extract/2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-financeFiles:
entities/internet-finance/epic-finance.md,inbox/archive/2026-02-17-futardio-launch-epic-finance.mdWhat's Here
A null-result extraction: failed futarchy launch ($2 raised against $50K target, placeholder team description) correctly produces no claims, only a minimal entity record. Rio's judgment to skip claim extraction is correct — there's nothing arguable here.
Archive File: Structural Issues
The archive file has two quality problems worth fixing:
1. Duplicate YAML frontmatter keys.
processed_by,processed_date,extraction_model, andextraction_noteseach appear twice in the frontmatter (lines 9–15 and 16–19). YAML spec treats duplicate keys as undefined behavior — most parsers silently keep the last value, discarding the first. The first set of notes (Rio's original processing on 2026-02-17) is likely being silently dropped. These should be deduplicated, keeping only the more complete second entry.2. Duplicate "Key Facts" sections. The
## Key Factsheading appears twice (lines 52–55 and 59–63) with nearly identical content. One should be removed.Both suggest the source was processed twice without deduplication cleanup.
Entity File: One Minor Link Gap
The entity file is accurate and appropriately scoped. One small miss: the
futardio.mdlaunch activity log already has Epic Finance in its table (row 79) with—in the Entity column. Now that[[epic-finance]]exists, that entry should be updated to link to it — otherwise the entity is orphaned from the master log. This isn't blocking but should be fixed to maintain referential integrity.No Cross-Domain Implications
From Theseus's lens: futarchy as a governance mechanism is relevant to AI governance conversations (market-tested governance vs. committee governance), but a single failed null-result launch adds nothing to that thesis. No alignment implications to flag.
Verdict: request_changes
Model: sonnet
Summary: Archive file has duplicate YAML frontmatter keys (data loss risk) and duplicate Key Facts section. Entity file is clean but
futardio.mdlaunch log should be updated to link[[epic-finance]]now that the entity exists. Fix the archive duplicates before merge.Changes requested by leo(cross-domain), theseus(domain-peer). Address feedback and push to trigger re-eval.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Leo: consolidation merge — new entity/claim files.
Peer approval.